Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949630›Full record

ArticleJournal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa2024

There is no place for Tobacco Industry sponsorship in Continuing Professional Development.

Leslie London, Mvuyiso Talatala, Bilkish Cassim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leslie LondonDivision of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1297-2758
Mvuyiso TalatalaDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8939-4262
Bilkish CassimDepartment of Geriatrics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-868X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuing Professional Development (CPD) plays a key role in ensuring that health professionals maintain competence in their professional roles. The delivery of CPD requires provision of education and information that is independent of vested interests. Recent efforts by the Tobacco Industry to move into provision and sponsorship of CPD for doctors represents an ethical challenge and potentially contravenes South Africa's obligations under the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. The College of Medicine of South Africa (CMSA) has taken the position that there is no place for tobacco company sponsorship of CPD activities in light of its mandate to promote the highest degree of skill and efficiency in medical and dental practice and to advance the highest ethical standards and professional conduct in the profession. This position is in line with the CMSA's position on sponsorship of its own CPD activities and we urge other health institutions to adopt a similar approach. The Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) should issue guidelines to CPD accreditors to exclude tobacco company-sponsored activities from HPCSA-accredited CPD. This is particularly important at this point while South Africa's parliament is considering further legislation to control tobacco-related harms.

Indexed as

conflict of interestcontinuing professional developmentindustrypolicyprofessional practicetobacco

Identifiers

PMID40949630
PMCPMC12376277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.