Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949620›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Incorporating the video communication assessment for error disclosure in residency curricula: a mixed methods study of faculty perceptions.

Emily Grossniklaus, Ann M King, Angelo E D'Addario, Karen Berg Brigham, Thomas H Gallagher, Thea G Musselman, Kendra Hester, Kathleen M Mazor, Andrew A White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily GrossniklausDepartment of Medicine, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Ann M KingNational Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Angelo E D'AddarioNational Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Karen Berg BrighamCollaborative for Accountability and Improvement, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Thomas H GallagherDepartment of Medicine and Department of Bioethics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Thea G MusselmanNational Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Kendra HesterNational Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Kathleen M MazorDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Andrew A WhiteDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: U.S. resident physicians are required to demonstrate competency in disclosing patient safety events to patients, including harmful errors. The Video-based Communication Assessment (VCA) is a novel tool that provides opportunities to practice and receive feedback on communication skills. VCA practice and feedback are associated with improvements in residents' error disclosure skills, but no research exists regarding faculty members' views on implementing the VCA in patient safety curricula. We sought to evaluate faculty members' views on using the VCA for teaching error disclosure communication in residency, and to identify barriers and facilitators to VCA adoption. Methods: Mixed methods study using a validated survey of Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility (AAF), and thematic content analysis of structured key informant interviews with faculty. Results: 25 faculty completed both the AAF survey and interview. Overall, the faculty rated the VCA with a mean AAF score of 4.23 (out of 5). Analysis of the interviews identified case quality, relevancy, and fulfillment of a curricular void as attractive aspects of the tool, while feedback delays and content were identified as limitations. A major challenge to implementation included finding curricular time. Faculty anticipated the VCA would be useful for resident remediation and could be used in faculty coaching on error disclosure. Conclusion: The VCA seems to be an acceptable and feasible tool for teaching error disclosure; this finding warrants confirmation and testing in other specialties. Faculty members expected the VCA would be useful for both improving poor performance as well as informing faculty coaching, although these approaches remain untested. To facilitate adoption, faculty recommended protecting curricular time for VCA use and effectively communicating with residents about who will review their personal assessments and how the exercise will support their learning.

Indexed as

communication skills assessmentcrowdsourcingcurriculum changefaculty perceptionsformative assessmentgraduate medical educationmedical error disclosuremixed methods

Identifiers

PMID40949620
PMCPMC12425960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.