Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949572›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2025

Comprehensive analysis of grazing intensity impacts on different types of grassland in Xinjiang, China: a meta-analysis.

Yu Zheng, Huifang Yao, Kairui Chao, Xiuzhi Ma, Yanan Ma

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu Zheng *Forestry College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Huifang Yao *Forestry College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Kairui ChaoForestry College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Xiuzhi MaForestry College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Yanan MaForestry College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grazing is the primary use of grassland in Xinjiang and plays a key role in the grassland ecosystem. Grazing intensity has a profound impact on the healthy development of grassland. To date, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the overall response of the main types of grassland in Xinjiang to different intensities of grazing. Based on 73 peer-reviewed studies, we conducted a meta-analysis of the response of soil properties and community vegetation characteristics to grazing intensity in five main types of grassland in Xinjiang. The results showed the following: (1) Grazing reduced the soil total carbon (TC) and total potassium (TK) of grassland soil in Xinjiang and increased the content of available phosphorus (AP) in soil. Moderate grazing reduced the soil TC and increased the total nitrogen (TN). Heavy grazing significantly reduced soil organic carbon (SOC) and density (

Indexed as

community characteristicsgrazing intensitymeta-analysissoil propertiesXinjiang grassland

Identifiers

PMID40949572
PMCPMC12427785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.