ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Environmental levels of microplastics disrupt growth and stress pathways in edible crops via species-specific mechanisms.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic fungal consortia enhance maize growth and soil biological functions under microplastic stress.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Uptake, translocation, and phytotoxic mechanisms of polystyrene and polylactic acid nanoplastics in tobacco seedlings.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Micro- and nanoplastics-induced stress in plants: uptake, physiological disruption, and toxicity mechanisms.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Microplastics (MPs) are emerging contaminants in agricultural soils. However, the responses of different plant species to MP stress under soil conditions across varying concentration levels, as well as the underlying mechanisms, remain insufficiently understood. Methods: This study examined the morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses of Chinese cabbage ( Results: PS-MPs altered soil properties by increasing pH and water-holding capacity (WHC), which promoted early germination in both species. However, during later growth stages, MPs inhibited development in a species-specific manner. In cherry radish, root length and fruit diameter decreased by 35.0% and 20.4%, respectively, primarily due to physical blockage. In Chinese cabbage, leaf area and petiole number declined by 35.9% and 41.7%, mainly driven by soil structural disruption and nutrient loss. Notably, the most pronounced effects occurred at low (10 mg/kg) to medium (50 mg/kg) concentrations, indicating a non-linear dose-response relationship. Hierarchical regression analysis (HRA) further revealed distinct toxicity mechanisms: physical accumulation and localized hypoxia were predominant in cherry radish, whereas oxidative stress and redox imbalance played a central role in Chinese cabbage. Discussion: These findings support current ecotoxicological models and highlight the importance of plant-particle interactions in shaping crop responses. The results provide new insight into MP phytotoxicity and inform future risk assessments under realistic soil conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.