Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949545›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Automated seed counting using image processing and deep learning.

Qiuyu Zu, Teng Liu, Wenpeng Zhu, Yan Pan, Jinxu Wang, Xinru Song, Jialin Yu, Shu Dang, Xiaoming Yu, Zhenyu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qiuyu ZuSchool of Agriculture, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, Jilin City, China.
Teng LiuPeking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Laboratory of Advanced Agricultural Sciences in Weifang, Weifang, China.
Wenpeng ZhuPeking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Laboratory of Advanced Agricultural Sciences in Weifang, Weifang, China.
Yan PanPeking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Laboratory of Advanced Agricultural Sciences in Weifang, Weifang, China.
Jinxu WangPeking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Laboratory of Advanced Agricultural Sciences in Weifang, Weifang, China.
Xinru SongPeking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Laboratory of Advanced Agricultural Sciences in Weifang, Weifang, China.
Jialin YuPeking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Laboratory of Advanced Agricultural Sciences in Weifang, Weifang, China.
Shu DangSchool of Agriculture, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, Jilin City, China.
Xiaoming YuSchool of Agriculture, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, Jilin City, China.
Zhenyu ZhangSchool of Agriculture, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, Jilin City, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate seed counting is an essential task in agricultural research and farming, supporting activities such as crop breeding, yield prediction, and weed management. Traditional manual seed counting, while accurate, is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to human error, particularly for large quantities of micro-sized seeds. Methods: This study developed two automated computer vision approaches integrated into a mobile application (app) for seed counting: one utilizing image processing (IP) and the other based on deep learning (DL). These methods aim to address the limitations of traditional manual counting by providing automated, efficient alternatives. Results: The IP-based method demonstrated high accuracy comparable to manual counting and offered substantial time savings. However, its reliance on controlled environmental conditions, such as uniform lighting, limits its versatility for field apps. The DL-based method excelled in speed and scalability, processing counts in as little as 0.33 seconds per image, but its accuracy was inconsistent for visually complex or densely clustered seeds. Discussion: Both automated methods significantly enhance the efficiency of seed counting, providing a practical and accessible solution for various agricultural contexts. The integration of these methods into a mobile app streamlines seed counting for laboratory research, field studies, seed production, and breeding trials, offering a transformative approach to modernizing seed counting practices while reducing time and labor requirements.

Indexed as

deep learningimage processingmobile appseed countingYOLOv5

Identifiers

PMID40949545
PMCPMC12426890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.