ArticleCell reports sustainability2025
Barriers to quantifying human alterations of global floodplains and how we can overcome them.
Article in Cell reports sustainability, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The world's natural floodplains are being lost and degraded by human alterations. The lack of standardized data for quantifying these floodplain alterations, as well as the absence of convergence among data, analysis, and approaches, has led to significant uncertainty. We discover four primary barriers contributing to this problem: (1) discrepancies in defining floodplain alterations, (2) inconsistent floodplain boundaries, (3) insufficient use of data (e.g., over-reliance on population density), and (4) mismatches in the spatial resolution and scale of analyses (e.g., aggregated across basins or countries using temporally fragmented, short-duration data). As the first step to overcome these barriers, we recommend benchmarking global floodplains using high-resolution land-use data and indices of human disturbance and by integrating existing dams and levees within floodplain maps, establishing a global reference floodplain status from which alterations and critical change points can be continuously tracked. We advocate for a new socio-ecohydrological model of floodplain management-one that redefines human alterations by considering both structural changes and functional losses within a balanced framework of benefits and trade-offs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.