Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949516›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine2025

Optimizing Maternal Healthcare Access: A Mixed Method Study on Dual Utilization of Public and Private Antenatal Care Services in Puducherry, India.

L Swathy Madhusoodanan, Mahalakshmy Thulasingam, Sathish Rajaa, Sai Meenu, Debajyoti Bhattacharya, Kalaiselvy Arikrishnan, Sitanshu Sekhar Kar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L Swathy MadhusoodananDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Mahalakshmy ThulasingamDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Sathish RajaaDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Sai MeenuDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Debajyoti BhattacharyaDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Kalaiselvy ArikrishnanDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Sitanshu Sekhar KarDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Access to antenatal care (ANC) services has improved. However, it is also noted that some antenatal women seek multiple healthcare services. Exploring this practice will identify gaps in service provision and pave the path toward improving the quality of services. Objective: This study aimed to measure the concurrent use of public and private healthcare services for various components of ANC and understand the reasons for the dual utilization. Methodology: This explanatory mixed-method study enrolled 177 mothers residing in Puducherry, who had given birth in the last three years. A pretested, semi-structured questionnaire was administered, and six key informant interviews were conducted. Integration was performed in the interpretation stage, and a joint display was used to depict the results. We adopted the Donabedian model during the analysis and organized the codes under these major themes[1] Access;[2] Delivery of the Services;[3] and Quality of Care. Result: Most pregnant women (81.9%, 95% CI = 75.2%-86.8%) sought care from both public and private healthcare facilities, however, they preferred public facilities for delivery (74.6%, 95% CI = 67.6%-80.4%). The qualitative analysis revealed three major themes[1] Access;[2] Delivery of the Services;[3] and Quality of Care. Primary reasons for opting for private facilities included perceived superior ANC quality, organized care evident in scheduled appointments, reduced waiting time, frequent ultrasounds, personalized medication, and enhanced rapport with family. Women also believed that visits to government facilities are essential to avail the monetary benefits and have a seamless admission during delivery. They felt that government hospitals perform fewer cesarean sections. Conclusion: Strengthening public-private partnerships could enhance antenatal care utilization, benefiting pregnant women and streamlining healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

Antenatal carepublic and private health facilitiesutilization pattern of antenatal care

Identifiers

PMID40949516
PMCPMC12430846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.