ArticleOman medical journal2025
Evaluating Physicians' Experiences and Compliance with the SPIKES Protocol for Communicating Adverse News: A Cross-sectional Study Conducted in Muscat, Oman.
Article in Oman medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of physicians in delivering bad news and their adherence to the SPIKES protocol within the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) in Muscat, Oman. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2023 to June 2024 at primary healthcare centers in Muscat. Data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire completed by physicians at these centers. Results: A total of 140 physicians completed the questionnaire (response rate = 100%). The vast majority of participants (n = 133, 95.0%) recognized the importance of training in breaking bad news and expressed a willingness to attend future training sessions. Nearly half of the participants (n = 67, 47.9%) reported negative experiences due to improper delivery of bad news. Overall, adherence to the SPIKES protocol was categorized as low (n = 2, 1.4%), medium (n = 25, 17.9%), and high (n = 113, 80.7%). No significant associations were found between adherence levels and any sociodemographic or clinical characteristics. Conclusions: Physicians in primary care face challenges in delivering bad news, which are influenced by cultural factors, training, and adherence to protocol. These challenges can be mitigated through regular, targeted training programs, beginning at the undergraduate level and continuing throughout a physicians' careers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.