Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949452›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025

Retrocaval ureter: a narrative review.

Sonia Pérez-Bertólez, Paula Salcedo, Leopoldo Tapia, Anna Domenech, Oriol Martín-Solé, Luis García-Aparicio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sonia Pérez-BertólezPediatric Urology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3312-0952
Paula SalcedoPediatric Urology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2579-2094
Leopoldo TapiaPediatric Urology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6066-1391
Anna DomenechPediatric Urology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0873-2086
Oriol Martín-SoléPediatric Urology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4758-9321
Luis García-AparicioPediatric Urology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-562X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly resulting from the abnormal development of the inferior vena cava (IVC), where the ureter passes posteriorly and loops around the IVC. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the etiology, classification, clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies for retrocaval ureter. Methods: We performed a narrative, non-systematic literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science for articles related to retrocaval ureter to perform a narrative review of the current literature on retrocaval ureter, including clinical case series, reviews, and surgical outcome studies. Emphasis was placed on diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, and outcomes. Key Content and Findings: Retrocaval ureter has an estimated incidence of 1 in 1,000 births and is more frequently diagnosed in males. It is classified into two anatomical types, with Type 1 being more common and often associated with significant hydronephrosis. Advances in imaging, including computed tomography (CT) urography and magnetic resonance (MR) urography, have improved diagnostic accuracy. The management of retrocaval ureter varies depending on the severity of symptoms, but surgical correction, primarily through minimally invasive techniques like laparoscopic or robotic ureteroureterostomy, is the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients. Minimally invasive surgery offers reduced recovery time and excellent outcomes. Conclusions: Retrocaval ureter is a rare but significant condition that can lead to ureteral obstruction and hydronephrosis. Early diagnosis through modern imaging and prompt surgical intervention in symptomatic cases can prevent long-term renal damage. Minimally invasive techniques have emerged as the gold standard for surgical management, offering favorable outcomes with minimal complications.

Indexed as

circumcaval uretercongenital anomaliesRetrocaval ureterureteral obstruction

Identifiers

PMID40949452
PMCPMC12433159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.