Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949451›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025

Review of the role of paclitaxel urethral balloon dilation for initial treatment of newly diagnosed short bulbar strictures.

Chandler Hudson, Tiffany L Damm, M Francesca Monn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chandler HudsonDivision of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
Tiffany L DammDivision of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
M Francesca MonnDivision of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior urethral stricture disease represents a significant burden of disease for adult men and remains challenging to treat without definitive open surgery in the form of urethroplasty, which requires specialized training. Many patients, particularly outside of metropolitan centers, can struggle to access reconstructive urologists for definitive repair. Endoscopic interventions-dilation, direct vision internal urethrotomy, and traditional urethral balloon dilation (UBD)-are standard first line therapy for urethral strictures, but these endoscopic interventions have high rates of recurrence. Adjuvant therapies such as mitomycin and steroids have been studied and utilized to improve endoscopic interventions with varying success. The novel paclitaxel drug coated balloon for UBD has been reported to have significantly lower recurrence rates of urethral strictures when compared with traditional endoscopic interventions. This is evidenced by randomized control trial data for 1 through 5 years post intervention. Current American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines recommend reserving the use of drug coated UBD for recurrent short anterior urethral strictures; however, these balloons are increasingly being utilized by reconstructive and general urologists in the primary setting due to the significant improvement in recurrence free survival. Herein, the authors evaluate the historical progression of endoscopic interventions and discuss the existing data for use of drug coated balloons in the primary setting.

Indexed as

drug coated balloonOptilumeoutcomespaclitaxelUrethral stricture disease

Identifiers

PMID40949451
PMCPMC12433163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.