ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Diagnostic value and external validation of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in clinically significant prostate cancer.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Given the significant economic burden of prostate cancer (PCa), its diagnostic methods need to be improved. The limitations of the subjective Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) underscore the need for generalizable radiomics in clinically significant PCa (csPCa). This study aimed to build a machine-learning model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) to diagnose csPCa. Methods: Prognostic model development: This study retrospectively included the data of 445 patients from two centers, of whom 206 had csPCa and 239 had clinically non-significant PCa (ncsPCa). The training set comprised 120 csPCa patients and 141 ncsPCa patients. The test set comprised 52 csPCa patients and 61 ncsPCa patients. The external validation comprised 34 csPCa patients and 37 ncsPCa patients. Results: Features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) sequences and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps based on bpMRI radiomics. From 3662 radiomics features, 10 stable radiomics features were selected for model construction based on intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Three diagnostic models for csPCa were constructed. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the PI-RADS-scoring model, which was based on visual assessments by radiologists, were 0.8271, 0.7905, and 0.8331 in the training, test, and external validation sets, respectively; while those for the clinical scoring model were 0.9236, 0.8846, and 0.8378, respectively; and those for the radiomics model were 0.9790, 0.9584, and 0.9523, respectively. There were significant differences between the radiomics model and the PI-RADS-scoring model (P Conclusions: The radiomics model can reliably detect and classify csPCa, and is a very powerful non-invasive auxiliary tool that could be used as an alternative method for diagnosing csPCa in personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.