ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
A female overactive bladder risk model developed by machine learning: based on 2007-2018 NHANES data.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a urinary system syndrome that has a serious impact on daily life. Currently, the methods for estimating the risk of OAB are relatively limited, mainly relying on the symptoms reported by patients themselves. There is an urgent need to develop new risk models for the OAB diagnosis. This study aims to assess the risk of OAB in the female population by training machine learning (ML) models. Methods: Based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2007 to 2018, a total of 10,807 female participants were included in the model. Support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression fitting, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF) algorithm, gradient boosting, decision tree (DT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were used to develop OAB risk models. Ten characteristic factors were used in the construction of the models. Results: Among the seven ML algorithms, the RF model demonstrated the best performance with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.879. Among the 10 characteristic factors, hypertension was the most important influencing factor, and the impact of diabetes and sleep disorders on OAB risk cannot be ignored. Conclusions: The results show that the female OAB risk model constructed by ML technology in this study has good diagnostic performance and interpretability, which is helpful to improve the diagnosis of OAB in the female population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.