ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025
A review of management options for vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis and the emergence of robotic reconstruction.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research trends in robot-assisted urethral reconstruction for urethral stricture disease: a visualized bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon Dilation for Male Sphincteric (Membranous) Urethral Strictures: 53 Consecutive Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS), a sequela of radical prostatectomy, is among the most complex conditions managed by reconstructive urologists. As a distinct entity from bladder neck contracture, VUAS can be managed endoscopically or with reconstruction. There is a paucity of higher-level evidence and head-to-head comparisons between VUAS management options. Interpretation of existing studies is further complicated by variations in diagnostic staging of VUAS, definitions of recurrent VUAS, and criteria for post-procedural success. Multiple endoscopic approaches are available including dilation, transurethral incision, transurethral resection, intralesional injections, and endoscopic urethroplasty. Classically, reconstruction for VUAS is offered after a single failed attempt at endoscopic management. Reconstructive options include transperineal reconstruction, open abdominopelvic reconstruction, and robotic-assisted surgical techniques. In recent years, several advances in reconstruction have developed into minimally invasive techniques using multi- and single-port robotics. Early outcomes of robotic reconstructive surgery demonstrate excellent rates of treatment success and, compared to open approaches, notably lower rates of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.