Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949428›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025

A review of management options for vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis and the emergence of robotic reconstruction.

Aurash Naser-Tavakolian, Ziho Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aurash Naser-TavakolianDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ziho LeeDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS), a sequela of radical prostatectomy, is among the most complex conditions managed by reconstructive urologists. As a distinct entity from bladder neck contracture, VUAS can be managed endoscopically or with reconstruction. There is a paucity of higher-level evidence and head-to-head comparisons between VUAS management options. Interpretation of existing studies is further complicated by variations in diagnostic staging of VUAS, definitions of recurrent VUAS, and criteria for post-procedural success. Multiple endoscopic approaches are available including dilation, transurethral incision, transurethral resection, intralesional injections, and endoscopic urethroplasty. Classically, reconstruction for VUAS is offered after a single failed attempt at endoscopic management. Reconstructive options include transperineal reconstruction, open abdominopelvic reconstruction, and robotic-assisted surgical techniques. In recent years, several advances in reconstruction have developed into minimally invasive techniques using multi- and single-port robotics. Early outcomes of robotic reconstructive surgery demonstrate excellent rates of treatment success and, compared to open approaches, notably lower rates of

Indexed as

cancer survivorshipProstate cancerrobot-assisted surgeryurinary bladder neck obstruction

Identifiers

PMID40949428
PMCPMC12433180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.