ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Current debate in gastric cancer surgery: Omentectomy?
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the advancement of technology and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy, molecular targeted agents, gastrectomy, and D2 lymph node dissection are the only curative treatment option for advanced gastric cancer (GC). The most common sites of recurrence in patients with GC are the peritoneum and omentum. The omentum contains areas rich in lymphatic tissue (the milky area) that form the connection between the peritoneum and the lymphatic system. Tumor cells are often found in these areas. Therefore, omentectomy is added to radical gastric resection and modified D2 lymph node dissection in the treatment of GC. Total omentectomy is recommended by Western countries for GC diagnosed at T3-4 stage, while Japanese research suggests partial omentectomy at T1-2 stage and total omentectomy at T3-4 stage due to early diagnosis of GC. In addition to the differences in tumor biology, the fact that patients in Western countries are more likely to receive perioperative chemotherapy and the 5% incidence of omental metastasis in advanced disease has led to the belief that partial omentectomy is an adequate surgical procedure compared with total omentectomy. There are studies recommending total omentectomy for the removal of possible tumor foci, and there are some studies reporting that partial omentectomy is sufficient even in advanced GC. The aim of this review was to investigate whether total or partial omentectomy should be performed in patients with GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.