Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949383›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025

Current debate in gastric cancer surgery: Omentectomy?

Enver Ilhan, Mehmet Yildirim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enver IlhanDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir Faculty of Medicine, Izmir City Hospital, İzmir 35530, Türkiye. enverhan60@gmail.com.
Mehmet YildirimDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir Faculty of Medicine, Izmir City Hospital, İzmir 35530, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the advancement of technology and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy, molecular targeted agents, gastrectomy, and D2 lymph node dissection are the only curative treatment option for advanced gastric cancer (GC). The most common sites of recurrence in patients with GC are the peritoneum and omentum. The omentum contains areas rich in lymphatic tissue (the milky area) that form the connection between the peritoneum and the lymphatic system. Tumor cells are often found in these areas. Therefore, omentectomy is added to radical gastric resection and modified D2 lymph node dissection in the treatment of GC. Total omentectomy is recommended by Western countries for GC diagnosed at T3-4 stage, while Japanese research suggests partial omentectomy at T1-2 stage and total omentectomy at T3-4 stage due to early diagnosis of GC. In addition to the differences in tumor biology, the fact that patients in Western countries are more likely to receive perioperative chemotherapy and the 5% incidence of omental metastasis in advanced disease has led to the belief that partial omentectomy is an adequate surgical procedure compared with total omentectomy. There are studies recommending total omentectomy for the removal of possible tumor foci, and there are some studies reporting that partial omentectomy is sufficient even in advanced GC. The aim of this review was to investigate whether total or partial omentectomy should be performed in patients with GC.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastric cancerOmentectomyPartial omentectomyTotal omentectomy

Identifiers

PMID40949383
PMCPMC12427023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.