ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
Well-being interventions in U.S. colleges: a scoping review from a positive higher education perspective.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching staff as gatekeepers for student mental health in higher education: findings from an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study on mental health promotion, psychological crises, and stigma.International journal of mental health systems · 2026Article
- Experiential Course Learning, Wellness, and Higher Education: Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- The mediating role of academic satisfaction and examination-related stress in explaining the association between academic grit and university students' subjective well-being.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Attitudes toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and civic engagement among Spanish university students: the mediational role of flourishing.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- An upstream approach to veterinary workforce wellbeing: an evaluative review of an embedded wellbeing curriculum in veterinary education.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In response to growing concerns about student mental health, this scoping review synthesizes 40 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2009 and 2024 on well-being interventions for undergraduate students in U.S. higher education, examined through the emerging lens of Positive Higher Education. Drawing from diverse methodologies and interventions-including mindfulness, cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychoeducation, and positive psychology strategies-the review examines how well-being is defined, implemented, and assessed across curricular and co-curricular contexts. While many interventions demonstrated positive outcomes, particularly in reducing stress and enhancing psychological well-being, the field remains limited by conceptual ambiguity, inconsistent theoretical frameworks, and insufficient attention to long-term institutionalization and sustainability. Most studies lacked a clearly articulated definition of well-being, and relatively few were embedded in academic curricula. This review underscores the need for a coordinated, theory-informed approach to integrating well-being as a core educational outcome, aligned with the values of liberal arts education. It concludes with a call to develop a Positive Higher Education Implementation Toolkit to guide institutions in embedding well-being into policy, pedagogy, and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.