Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949338›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Mentors' resources and premature match closure in challenging contexts: testing a model of mediating processes in an online and a school-based mentoring program.

Sonja Bayer, Heidrun Stoeger, Albert Ziegler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sonja BayerDepartment of School Research, School Development, and Evaluation, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Heidrun StoegerDepartment of School Research, School Development, and Evaluation, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Albert ZieglerDepartment of Psychology, University of Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This research aimed to investigate the impact of mentors' resources on the premature termination of mentoring relationships in challenging contexts as well as mediating psychological processes. Method: In two studies, we analyzed the data of 98 mentors from an online mentoring program for girls in STEM subjects and the data of 60 mentors from a school-based mentoring program with talented youth. Participants were surveyed with a standardized questionnaire about their mentoring experiences during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, which created a challenging context. Results: The results indicated that a reduction of mentoring resources is associated with an increased risk of premature match closure. This effect of resources was mediated in two ways: by (a) mentors' confidence in their mentoring abilities, which predicted feelings of helplessness, and (b) mentors' beliefs in the modifiability of deficits and the stability of abilities, which predicted adaptive responses to failure. Furthermore, mentors in the school-based program reported a more significant reduction in mentoring resources, which, in turn, was more strongly associated with premature match closure than in the online mentoring program. Discussion: This suggests that online mentoring might be more robust than face-to-face mentoring under unfavorable environmental conditions. Overall, our study points to equipping mentors with adequate resources and offering ongoing support, especially in challenging environments.

Indexed as

beliefsconfidence in own abilityCOVID-19helplessnessmentoringonline mentoringpremature match closure

Identifiers

PMID40949338
PMCPMC12425774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.