Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949336›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Effects of a personalized PERMA-based intervention on the mental health of junior high school students: a randomized clinical trial.

Lei Zhang, Xiao Chen, Hengjing Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lei ZhangShanghai Minhang District Mental Health Center (Pujiang Hospital of Shanghai Mental Health Center), Shanghai, China.
Xiao ChenSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hengjing WanShanghai Minhang District Mental Health Center (Pujiang Hospital of Shanghai Mental Health Center), Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adolescence is a critical period marked by increasing academic pressure and evolving self-cognition, making junior high school students particularly vulnerable to mental health challenges. Positive psychology interventions (PPIs) based on the PERMA framework have shown promise in improving well-being, but studies targeting Chinese middle school students remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a personalized PERMA-based PPI in enhancing well-being and resilience among junior high school students in Shanghai, China. Methods: A total of 154 students were randomly assigned to either an experimental group ( Results: At baseline, the experimental group had lower scores in positive emotion (12.4 ± 4.02 vs. 13.8 ± 4.39), relationships (12.4 ± 4.22 vs. 13.8 ± 4.05), and total well-being (47.5 ± 13.6 vs. 51.1 ± 14.4) compared to the control group. After the intervention, the experimental group showed significant improvements in positive emotion (+2.3), relationship (+2.2), and total well-being (+3.4). The experimental group also demonstrated significant increases in accomplishment (+1.4), engagement (+1.2), goal focus (+2.1), positive cognition (+1.5), and total resilience (+5.2). No significant changes were observed in coping styles, though slight improvements in positive coping tendency (from -0.02 to -0.13) and a slight decrease in negative coping tendency (from -0.02 to -0.01). Conclusion: This study provides empirical evidence for the effectiveness of personalized PPIs in addressing adolescents' mental health challenges, with notable improvements in well-being and resilience. Limitations include the small sample size for paired analysis (

Indexed as

adolescent healthcoping stylesPERMApositive psychology interventionsresiliencewell-being

Identifiers

PMID40949336
PMCPMC12426034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.