ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025
Ultrasound-guided block of the superior cervical ganglion for migraine attacks: a propensity score-matched retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided superior cervical ganglion (SCG) block in conjunction with standard triptan in the management of migraine attacks. Methods: In total, 243 subjects who received an adjunctive US-guided SCG block alongside triptan for a migraine attack were enrolled as the SCG cohort. A 1:1 propensity score based on baseline covariates was used to match 243 cases who received triptan alone as the control. The primary endpoints were pain relief and freedom from pain within 24 h after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included headache relief and freedom from pain within 2 h, monthly migraine days (MMDs), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores, Migraine-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire (MSQ) scores, and adverse events. Results: The rates of pain relief and freedom from pain at 24 h after the block were increased in the SCG cases compared to the controls {73.3% vs. 49.4%, with mean difference [MD] of 23.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.5%-29.0%] and 64.2% vs. 37.4%, with MD = 26.7% [95% CI: 18.2%-31.3%], respectively}. Superiority was met, as the 95% CI fell within the superiority margin of 15%. Higher rates of pain relief and freedom from pain at 2 h following the procedure were reported in the SCG cohort (both Conclusions: US-guided SCG block with triptan was superior to triptan alone in achieving headache remission during a migraine attack for up to 24 h, resulting in reduced migraine days and improved functional ability and life quality at the 1-month follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.