Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949313›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Ontologies as the semantic bridge between artificial intelligence and healthcare.

Radha Ambalavanan, R Sterling Snead, Julia Marczika, Gideon Towett, Alex Malioukis, Mercy Mbogori-Kairichi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Radha AmbalavananResearch Department, The Self Research Institute, Broken Arrow, OK, United States.
R Sterling SneadResearch Department, The Self Research Institute, Broken Arrow, OK, United States.
Julia MarczikaResearch Department, The Self Research Institute, Broken Arrow, OK, United States.
Gideon TowettResearch Department, The Self Research Institute, Broken Arrow, OK, United States.
Alex MalioukisResearch Department, The Self Research Institute, Broken Arrow, OK, United States.
Mercy Mbogori-KairichiResearch Department, The Self Research Institute, Broken Arrow, OK, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ontologies serve as a foundational bridge between artificial intelligence (AI) and healthcare, enabling structured knowledge frameworks that enhance data interoperability, clinical decision support, and precision medicine. Objective: This perspective aims to highlight the essential role of ontologies in enabling adaptive, interoperable frameworks that evolve with technological and medical advances to support personalized, accurate, and globally connected healthcare solutions. Methods: This perspective is based on a targeted literature exploration conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, prioritizing studies published between 2010 and 2025 and including earlier seminal works where necessary to provide historical context, focusing on ontology-driven AI applications in healthcare. Sources were selected for their relevance to semantic integration, interoperability, and interdisciplinary applicability. Results: Through the standardization of medical concepts, relationships, and terminologies, ontologies enable semantic integration across diverse healthcare datasets, including clinical, genomic, and phenotypic data. They also address challenges such as fragmented data and inconsistent terminologies. This semantic clarity supports AI applications in clinical decision support, predictive analytics, natural language processing (NLP), and patient-specific disease modeling. Conclusions: Despite their transformative potential, ontology integration faces significant challenges, including computational complexity, scalability, and semantic mismatches across evolving international standards, such as SNOMED CT and HL7 FHIR. Ethical concerns, particularly around data privacy, informed consent, and algorithmic bias, also require careful consideration. To address these challenges, this perspective outlines strategies including adaptive ontology models, robust governance frameworks, and AI-assisted ontology management techniques. Together, these approaches aim to support personalized, accurate, and globally interoperable healthcare systems.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical decision supportethical AIhealthcare integrationmulti-modal data integrationnatural language processingontologiessemantic interoperability

Identifiers

PMID40949313
PMCPMC12426170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.