ReviewMalaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia2025
Prognosis of patients with coronavirus disease with or without anosmia: A systematic review.
Review in Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: According to numerous research, anosmia has been reported more frequently as one of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) symptoms. However, whether anosmia is a relevant prognostic factor of COVID-19 outcomes is still unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the relationship between anosmia and COVID-19 prognosis. Methods: PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar and the WHO COVID-19 Research Database were scanned for published literature from September 2021 to December 2022 about the prognosis of patients positive for COVID-19 with anosmia. 'COVID-19' and 'prognosis' were among the search terms used. Pooled estimates of odds ratios (ORs) were then calculated by comparing patients with and without anosmia in terms of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. Results: A total of 16 full-text articles were included in this systematic review. There were a total of 40 deaths among the patients with olfactory dysfunction and 1681 deaths among those without olfactory dysfunction, with an OR of 0.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.34; P<0.0001), indicating that the patients with COVID-19 with olfactory dysfunction had a decreased mortality rate. Conclusion: The good prognosis of patients with COVID-19 with anosmia is demonstrated in our study by the low mortality rate in those with anosmia. However, there is no association between the prognosis and ICU admission among patients with COVID-19 with anosmia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.