SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Toxicity profiles of ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An evaluation of taletrectinib for the treatment of ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown significant efficacy in advanced ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no systematic investigation has been conducted on the toxicity profiles of these TKIs, which are critical for clinical decision-making and patient management. We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies that reported on the safety profiles of ROS1-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC. Eligible studies were those published between 1 January 2013 and 28 February 2025 in English language. A proportional meta-analysis was performed. Primary outcomes included the incidence rates of systemic all-grade adverse events (AEs; grades 1-5) and serious adverse events (SAEs; grades 3-5) for each ROS1-TKI, while secondary outcomes focused on incidence rates of specific AEs and SAEs. This systematic review and proportional meta-analysis included 26 studies involving 5,273 patients. ROS1-TKIs demonstrated high incidences of systemic all-grade AEs, ranging from 90% to 99%. Systemic SAEs exhibited greater variability across agents, ranging from 29% to 47%: crizotinib, 43% (95% CI, 36%-49%); ceritinib, 41% (95% CI, 37%-45%); lorlatinib, 39% (95% CI, 25%-55%); entrectinib, 32% (95% CI, 28%-36%); repotrectinib, 29% (95% CI, 24%-33%); iruplinalkib, 44% (95% CI, 38%-50%); and unecritinib, 47% (95% CI, 38%-56%). This indicated that repotrectinib might be more tolerable, while unecitinib might have a lower safety profile. Additionally, specific AE profiles varied across ROS1-TKIs: repotrectinib exhibited higher rates of dizziness, entrectinib demonstrated frequent fatigue, and lorlatinib showed an increased incidence of edema. Taletrectinib and unecritinib were notably associated with hepatotoxicity. This study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of ROS1-TKIs' toxicity profiles in NSCLC patients. These findings will guide drug selection and safety monitoring, emphasizing the necessity of considering patients' health status, potential risk factors, and the characteristics of ROS1-TKI-related adverse reactions. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024551353, identifier CRD42024551353.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.