ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Investigating the feasibility of machine learning to guide personalized red blood cell (RBC) transfusion: analyzing the heterogeneity of RBC transfusion in septic patients with hemoglobin levels of 7-9 g/dL based on the causal forest model.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study utilized the causal forest algorithm to explore the heterogeneity of treatment effects of low-dose red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on the 90-day survival rate of sepsis patients with hemoglobin (Hb) levels of 7-9 g/dL to develop personalized transfusion strategies. Methods: The data of patients the met the Sepsis-3 criteria with a minimum Hb level of 7-9 g/dL were obtained from the MIMIC-IV and MIMIC-III databases and divided into RBC transfusion and non-transfusion groups. Patients in both groups were paired using a propensity score matching analysis (PSM) after which a causal forest model was constructed using MIMIC-IV data. The model's accuracy was analyzed using out-of-bag data. Individual treatment effects (ITE) of MIMIC-III patients were predicted and categorized into four subgroups: Quantile1 to Quantile4, based on the effect size. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were established for each Quantile to determine the survival rates. Results: The MIMIC-IV and MIMIC-III database comprised 1,652 and 868 patients, with 826 (50%) and 434 (50%) in the RBC transfusion group, respectively, after PSM. The mean prediction coefficient estimated by the causal forest was 1.00 with a standard error of 0.57, while the differential forest prediction coefficient was 1.64 with a standard error of 0.48, demonstrating the model's ability to effectively identify differences in the impact of transfusion on survival rates among individuals. There was significant heterogeneity in the ITE among patients in the MIMIC-III validation cohort. Moreover, the ITE values were divided into Quantile1: -5.4% (-8.0%, -3.9%), Quantile2: -2.1% (-2.6%, -1.7%), Quantile3: -0.5% (-0.1%, +0.1%), and Quantile 4: +3.6% (+2.0%, +6.6%). The Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test demonstrated that the RBC transfusion decreased the survival of patients in Quantile1 (p < 0.001) and Quantile2 (p = 0.011) but increased the survival of patients in Quantile4 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: RBC transfusions among sepsis patients with Hb levels of 7-9 g/dL exhibit heterogenous treatment effects, which reduces the mortality of patients with high ITE. Although the causal forest model can guide personalized transfusion in these cases, randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.