ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Drug lag and associated factors of orphan drugs approved by the U.S. in China.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethics as if Your Life Depended on It.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2026Article
- Responses to Commentaries on "Ethics as if Your Life Depended on It".Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2026Article
- Development Timelines of Innovative Drugs in China: A 15-Year Cross-Sectional Analysis of Characteristics and Influencing Factors.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- The impact of China's drug regulatory reform on access to orphan drugs: a cross-sectional study of diseases listed in the rare disease catalog.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A pronounced disparity exists in the accessibility of orphan drugs between China and developed countries, such as the United States. Identifying and analyzing the critical determinants that contribute to this gap is essential for enhancing the availability of orphan drugs and promoting equitable access for patients. Methods: We included all new orphan drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2013 and 2023 and collected their approval information in China and the United States. Major factors of interest included accelerated review pathway, locations where pivotal clinical trials were conducted, therapeutic category, and other factors affecting the delay in drug launch. They were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression, analysis of covariance, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The FDA approved a total of 242 new orphan drugs between 2013 and 2023. Among these, 119 (49.2%) of these drugs had been approved in China as of 1 January 2025, with a median lag time of 1,004 days (2.75 years). Among them, 47 drugs (41.2%) were included in the China's List of Rare Diseases. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that the conduct of pivotal trials supporting FDA approval in mainland China was associated with whether such drugs were launched in China (odds ratio = 10.53, 95% confidence interval 3.67-40.79; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the Mann-Whitney U test indicated that such characteristics as the inclusion of indications in China's List of Rare Diseases, the granting of breakthrough therapy designation by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), and the inclusion of pivotal clinical trials in mainland China were all associated with the shortening of drug lag time. Discussion: Our findings suggest that orphan drug approval delays in China have improved significantly, but still face significant challenges. China's involvement in the global collaborative development of drugs not only helps shorten the relative lag time for drugs to obtain approval in China but also avoids repeated trials and significantly improves R&D efficiency. We recommend that pharmaceutical companies include Chinese patients in the drug development stage so that they can enjoy cutting-edge innovative therapies more quickly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.