ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025
Calcium sulphate and reduction in body weight: Evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Calcium sulphate and reduction in body weight: Evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following an application from Mediconomics APS, submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of Denmark, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to calcium sulphate and reduction in body weight. The Panel considers that the food constituent, calcium sulphate, is sufficiently characterised. A reduction in body weight is a beneficial physiological effect for overweight adults. The applicant submitted two human intervention studies investigating the effect of calcium sulphate on body weight. The Panel notes that no conclusions can be drawn from any of the human intervention studies submitted for the scientific substantiation of the claim and that no convincing evidence has been provided for a mechanism by which calcium sulphate could exert the claimed effect in vivo in humans. The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of calcium sulphate and a beneficial physiological effect on body weight under the proposed conditions of use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.