ArticleBJUI compass2025
Potential gains from radical treatment of men with prostate cancer according to life expectancy.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential gains from radical treatment of men with prostate cancer according to life expectancy.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the impact of age and life expectancy on treatment decisions and its consequences for outcomes among men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods: We studied men in Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) diagnosed between 2008 and 2022 with intermediate-risk or high-risk localized or locally advanced PCa and life expectancy between 2.5 and 15 years in the absence of PCa. Estimates of life expectancy were based on age and two comorbidity indices. Results: A total of 32 196 men were included in the analyses. Of these, 17 419 (54%) had a life expectancy between 10 and 15 years, of whom 11 147 (64%) received primary radical treatment. Age had a stronger influence than life expectancy on the selection of treatment. Around 10% of deaths within 10 years of diagnosis could potentially have been avoided if men with >10 years life expectancy, regardless of age, had received radical treatment, based on assumptions of high treatment efficacy (30% reduction in all-cause mortality) and high uptake of treatment (90%). Conclusion: A substantial proportion of healthy older men with intermediate and high-risk PCa did not undergo radical treatment. According to our model and assumptions, 10% of deaths within 10 years of diagnosis in these men could potentially have been avoided if they had received radical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.