Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40948970›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

The effect of hip manipulation on muscle strength, proprioception and motor tests of basketball players during training.

Rafał Studnicki, Zuzanna Patrzykąt, Adam Kawczyński

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rafał StudnickiDepartment of Physiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Zuzanna PatrzykątDepartment of Physiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Adam KawczyńskiDepartment of Sport Didactics, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to (i) investigate the effects of diagonal manual therapy on gluteus medius activation and (ii) examine its impact on quadriceps femoris activation, both critical for lower limb stability. Methods: Nine male basketball players (mean age 23.8 ± 4.1 years) participated in a randomized crossover trial, with measurements taken before the intervention, immediately after, and following a training session. Muscle activation of the gluteus medius, tensor fascia lata, and quadriceps was assessed via EMG, alongside evaluations of proprioception, the Y-Balance Test, and Standing Broad Jump. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant time effects for all Y-Balance Test directions (anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral) with large effect sizes (partial η Results: A significant interaction between intervention and assessment was also observed for proprioception at 90° hip flexion (p = 0.073), with a very large effect size (partial η Discussion: These findings provide preliminary evidence that diagonal manual therapy effectively enhances neuromuscular activation of the gluteus medius, a key muscle for lower limb stability. Moreover, the intervention influenced activation of other critical muscles such as the vastus lateralis and quadriceps femoris, suggesting a broader neuromuscular facilitation that may benefit dynamic postural control. Improvements in dynamic balance and proprioception further indicate potential functional gains.

Indexed as

diagonal manual therapydynamic balancegluteus medius activationlower limb stabilityneuromuscular system

Identifiers

PMID40948970
PMCPMC12423034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.