ReviewGland surgery2025
Intraoperative applications of artificial intelligence for augmented parathyroid gland recognition: a narrative review.
Review in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Intraoperative parathyroid gland recognition is a key step during thyroidectomy to decrease the risk of postoperative hypocalcemia and during parathyroidectomy to distinguish normal and abnormal glands. Current methods for intraoperative identification rely largely upon visual identification. Recent investigation of methods such as near-infrared (NIR) autofluorescence and indocyanine green (ICG) for enhanced recognition have demonstrated steep learning curves. Artificial intelligence (AI) augmentation of all methods of parathyroid gland identification may improve intraoperative recognition rates and ultimately decrease rates of postoperative hypoparathyroidism. This narrative review aims to summarize the status of intraoperative application of AI for parathyroid gland recognition. Methods: A systematic, comprehensive literature search was conducted using the search terms "artificial intelligence", "deep learning", "surgery", "parathyroid gland", and "parathyroid glands". Inclusion criteria included articles in English with the majority of the article devoted to intraoperative applications of AI on parathyroid gland recognition. Eleven studies were identified and included. Key Content and Findings: Eight studies focused on utilizing AI intraoperatively to identify parathyroid glands from surrounding tissues. Three studies focused on using AI to predict abnormal from normal parathyroid glands. Five studies used NIR autofluorescence, two studies used visual recognition during open thyroidectomy, two studies used visual recognition during endoscopic thyroidectomy, one study used NIR autofluorescence with ICG angiography, and one study used coaxial dual-red-green-blue/near-infrared (dual-RGB/NIR) imaging system to identify parathyroid glands. Recall and precision scores for the models ranged from 50-95% and 72-94%, respectively. Four studies compared model performance with that of senior and junior surgeons and found that the models outperformed junior surgeons while performing comparably to senior surgeons. Conclusions: AI augmentation of intraoperative parathyroid gland recognition demonstrates adequate accuracy results across a range of parathyroid gland recognition methods. Although these models are not currently available for widespread commercial use, the eventual integration into clinical practice may allow for enhanced intraoperative recognition of parathyroid glands, particularly in lower volume centers and for junior level surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.