ArticleBio-protocol2025
Training Mice to Perform Attentional Set-Shifting Under Head Restraint.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive flexibility is a process that involves dynamically adapting behavior to obtain a desired series of outcomes during continuously changing stimulus-response-reward associations. Attentional set-shifting is a multi-modal decision-making paradigm that tests cognitive flexibility, which can be useful for investigating neural circuitry that is disrupted in multiple neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, depression, and addiction. The canonical human attentional set-shifting paradigm for measuring cognitive flexibility is the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, in which subjects sort cards based on rules that change periodically and adapt their behavior by utilizing feedback in the form of correct and incorrect outcomes. To transfer these tests to rodent models, previous techniques involved attentional set-shifting paradigms in free-roaming test chambers, in which animals associated cues with reward locations. The protocol presented here involves an analogous attentional set-shifting paradigm, in which water-restricted mice are head-restrained on a platform and must keep track of periodically switching stimulus-response-outcome associations. The mice must learn to associate odor or whisker vibration cues with a binary directional lick response that triggers water delivery. The mice are trained to respond by licking one of two spouts, in which the correct decision is dependent on the current stimulus rule. This protocol allows for behaviorally measuring cognitive flexibility alongside neural activity by pairing the head-restrained paradigm with 2-photon calcium imaging, optogenetics, and extracellular and intracellular physiology. Key features • Head-restraint design that allows for optogenetic manipulation, in vivo imaging, extracellular and intracellular electrophysiology, and other manipulations. • Attentional set-shifting paradigm that measures cognitive flexibility in rodents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.