Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40948864›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025

A critical evaluation of methodological and mechanistic insights on probiotic-derived extracellular vesicles.

Chantal Ronacher, Claudio F Gonzalez, Graciela L Lorca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chantal RonacherDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, Genetics Institute, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Claudio F GonzalezDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, Genetics Institute, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Graciela L LorcaDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, Genetics Institute, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotic extracellular vesicles (pEVs) have emerged as promising postbiotics with potential applications in inflammatory diseases, infections, allergies, cancer treatment, autoimmune disorders, and even neurological and degenerative conditions. Yet despite the surge in research on pEVs, critical gaps and inconsistencies in study design, methodology, and mechanistic understanding hinder unlocking their full potential. This literature review provides a concise introduction to beneficial bacterial EVs, mechanistic insights into their role in interkingdom interactions, and current challenges in pEV research. We highlight methodological inconsistencies in model selection, control design, and effect measurement, discuss their consequences and provide recommendations to improve experimental rigor and comparability of results. These include methodological considerations like standardization strategies for pEV preparation, purification, formulation, and administration as well as general study design questions. Finally, we outline key avenues for future research, emphasizing the need for biomarkers to track pEV biodistribution, the identification of effector molecules, and a deeper understanding of their mechanistic targets, as well as their interactions with food components and their use as delivery systems, among others. By addressing these challenges, this review aims to provide a roadmap for advancing pEV research and facilitating their transition into clinical and biotechnological applications.

Indexed as

applicationsbacterial extracellular vesicleslimitationsmechanismsmethodologynutritionprobioticsstudy design

Identifiers

PMID40948864
PMCPMC12427791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.