ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025
A critical evaluation of methodological and mechanistic insights on probiotic-derived extracellular vesicles.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probiotic extracellular vesicles reprogram macrophage immunometabolism: From gut crosstalk to host health.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Review
- Postbiotics as Emerging Strategy Targeting Obesity- and Aging-Related Breast Cancer-Prospects in Prophylaxis and Therapy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Molecular mechanisms of virulence in Enterococcus faecium: integrating Esp, Acm, regulatory RNA networks in multidrug resistant nosocomial infections.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- The Intervention Effect of Externally Applying or Orally AdministeringMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Gut-derived small extracellular vesicles support trained innate immune tolerance in murine microglial cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Probiotic-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Potential Nano-Immunotherapeutic Platforms in IBD: A Clinician's Perspective.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Potential of Plant-Derived Exosome-Like Nanovesicles in Skin Tissue Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotic extracellular vesicles (pEVs) have emerged as promising postbiotics with potential applications in inflammatory diseases, infections, allergies, cancer treatment, autoimmune disorders, and even neurological and degenerative conditions. Yet despite the surge in research on pEVs, critical gaps and inconsistencies in study design, methodology, and mechanistic understanding hinder unlocking their full potential. This literature review provides a concise introduction to beneficial bacterial EVs, mechanistic insights into their role in interkingdom interactions, and current challenges in pEV research. We highlight methodological inconsistencies in model selection, control design, and effect measurement, discuss their consequences and provide recommendations to improve experimental rigor and comparability of results. These include methodological considerations like standardization strategies for pEV preparation, purification, formulation, and administration as well as general study design questions. Finally, we outline key avenues for future research, emphasizing the need for biomarkers to track pEV biodistribution, the identification of effector molecules, and a deeper understanding of their mechanistic targets, as well as their interactions with food components and their use as delivery systems, among others. By addressing these challenges, this review aims to provide a roadmap for advancing pEV research and facilitating their transition into clinical and biotechnological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.