Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40948856›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025

Development and validation of a serum inflammatory biomarker-driven machine-learning model for prognostic stratification in surgical limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

Zhiyuan Yao, Changlei Li, Fengyi Han, Yi Qin, Xiao Sun, Guohua Wang, Enzheng Yu, Peng Song, Hanqun Liu, Wenjie Jiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhiyuan Yao *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Changlei Li *Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Fengyi HanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yi QinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiao SunDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Guohua WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Enzheng YuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Peng SongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hanqun LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Wenjie JiaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robust prognostic markers for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are currently lacking, underscoring the need for novel prediction models to optimize individualized treatment and improve patient outcomes. Inflammatory/nutritional indexes have been extensively employed in prognostic investigations of malignant tumors. The study aimed to precisely ascertain the prognosis of SCLC patients undergoing surgery by preoperative serological indexes. Methods: We included patients with SCLC who underwent surgery at The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. Potential predictors included basic clinical characteristics and preoperative serum inflammatory/nutritional indexes. We employed 10 machine learning algorithms and their 101 combinations to select the superior model and establish a novel nomogram. Follow-up involved regular clinic visits or telephone contact, with imaging and laboratory tests conducted at defined intervals to assess overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The cohort was randomly split into training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Harrell's C-index, Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox regression analyses were used for model evaluation and prognostic assessment. Results: A total of 219 patients were included in this study. Prognostic nutritional index (PNI), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) were correlated with the prognosis of SCLC patients. Smoking status and the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage were independent prognostic indicators of OS. The Random Forest model achieved the highest mean concordance index (C-index) (0.784). Patients classified as high-risk based on this model exhibited a higher prevalence of smoking and more advanced pathological N stage and TNM stage. No significant differences were observed between risk groups regarding age, gender, body mass index (BMI), alcohol history, tumor site, pathological T stage, Ki-67 index, or visceral pleural invasion (VPI). Nomograms based on risk grouping, smoking status, and TNM stage demonstrated high precision and considerable clinical value. Multivariate Cox analysis identified PNI and NLR as the most valuable prognostic markers, with optimal cut-off values of 50.6 and 1.99, respectively. Conclusions: A machine learning model based on serological inflammatory/nutritional indexes can reasonably estimate the long-term prognosis of SCLC patients and is anticipated to serve as a practical instrument for identifying the ideal candidates for thoracic surgery.

Indexed as

inflammatory/nutritional indexmachine learningprognosisSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Identifiers

PMID40948856
PMCPMC12432609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.