ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Preoperative diagnostic accuracy of dominant lesion in multifocal pulmonary nodules.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic implications of dominant lesion misidentification in multiple primary lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to the widespread implementation of computed tomography (CT) in lung cancer screening, multifocal pulmonary nodules (MPNs) are increasingly detected. Given the importance of selecting preoperative dominant lesions (DLs) in the management of MPNs, this study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used approaches for assessment of preoperative DLs. Methods: Patients who underwent surgical resection and CT for MPNs from May 2019 to September 2023 were retrospectively collected from a single center. The postoperative DLs were determined based on the pathology results. Four methods were employed to identify preoperative DLs including diameter, Mayo model, Brock model, and Peking University multiple pulmonary nodules malignancy prediction model (PKU-M model) and the predictive results of these methods were compared with postoperative DLs. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the type of nodules. Results: A total of 999 patients with 2,285 nodules were included in this study. The accuracy of the proposed methods including diameter, Mayo model, Brock model, and PKU-M model for the assessment of preoperative DLs were 81.09%, 78.69%, 81.73%, and 78.77%, respectively. Compared to the pathology results, the Kappa values for the four methods were 0.62, 0.51, 0.59, and 0.51, respectively. Among the three subgroups, four methods applied in subsolid nodule group demonstrated the best performance with accuracy of 83.07%, 77.88%, 81.90% and 72.59%, respectively. Conclusions: Current assessment approaches for identifying preoperative DLs still have room for improvement and further studies are warranted to develop a more effective approach for the assessment of preoperative DLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.