Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40948844›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2025

Complex uniportal robotic-assisted sleeve resections under spontaneous ventilation and with double lumen intubation: a case series and a narrative review of the literature.

Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Pablo Gomes-da Silva de Rosenzweig, Luis Fernando Arana Bolaños, Adriana Simoneta Pimienta Ibarra, Hasanali David Walji, Patricio Santillan Dohetty, Jun Zhao, Chang Li, Mugurel Bosinceanu, Francina Valezka Bolaños Morales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Diego Gonzalez-Rivas *Department of Thoracic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Unit (UCTMI), Coruña University Hospital, Coruña, Spain.
Pablo Gomes-da Silva de Rosenzweig *Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
Luis Fernando Arana BolañosDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico.
Adriana Simoneta Pimienta IbarraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico.
Hasanali David WaljiDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
Patricio Santillan DohettyDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jun ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Chang LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Mugurel BosinceanuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Oncological Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Francina Valezka Bolaños MoralesDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Sleeve lobectomy (SL) has evolved into the preferred surgical option for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other complex thoracic tumors, offering superior functional and oncological outcomes compared to pneumonectomy. The recent advent of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), including its uniportal approach (uRATS), has extended the feasibility of SL to minimally invasive approaches. The objective of this study is to present our experience with uRATS sleeve resections, highlighting five complex cases, involving four sleeve lobectomies and one tracheal resection, performed using two different robotic platforms (da Vinci and ShuRui). Additionally, we aim to provide an up-to-date review of SL as a treatment strategy for NSCLC and centrally located tumors. Methods: We performed a narrative review covering publications from 2010 to 2025. The search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. Key Content and Findings: Although data on RATS SL remains limited, several publications have highlighted the potential benefits of this approach. Comparative studies evaluating different operative approaches for SL have shown that RATS offers advantages over both open and video-assisted thoracic surgery. uRATS SL represents a novel and evolving technique that combines technical precision with favorable perioperative outcomes. However, its adoption is often slow due to the inherent complexity and steep learning curve associated with the procedure. Conclusions: uRATS SL carinal and tracheal reconstructions have emerged as promising treatment strategies for centrally located tumors. However, there remains an urgent need for further comparative studies assessing both short- and long-term outcomes, as well as evaluating oncologic outcomes and their impact on patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

minimally invasive thoracic surgerynon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Robotic surgerysleeve lobectomy (SL)uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (uRATS)

Identifiers

PMID40948844
PMCPMC12432592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.