ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2025
Adjuvant radiotherapy in the era of new peri-operative systemic treatments for surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer: where do we stand?
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The role of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) in radically resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a topic of debate, particularly in pN2 disease. While phase III trials like PORT-C and LungART have demonstrated a significant reduction in mediastinal recurrence, they have failed to show improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS), raising concerns about increased cardiopulmonary toxicity. The rapid integration of chemo-immunotherapy and targeted therapies into peri-operative treatment has reshaped the NSCLC landscape, lowering the risk of distant failure and overall mortality while leaving local recurrence rates largely unchanged. Striking results from trials on immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in early-stage NSCLC highlight the potential for improved outcomes, yet the role of PORT in this evolving framework remains uncertain. Preclinical evidence suggests that PORT could enhance loco-regional control when combined with systemic treatments, but the lack of prospective trials exploring this synergy along with unanswered questions about additive toxicity hinders its clinical implementation. There is a critical need for tailored clinical trials that integrate advanced radiation techniques and systemic therapies to further optimize patients' outcome, both in terms of survival and quality of life. Such studies should focus on balancing the risks of mediastinal relapse, systemic progression and treatment-related toxicities, particularly for PORT-related grade 3 and 4 cardiac or pulmonary events. As treatment strategies continue to evolve, a multidisciplinary and personalized approach will be key to refining the management of resected NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.