ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
AI/ML-empowered approaches for predicting T Cell-mediated immunity and beyond.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in predicting T cell epitope recognition for cancer immunotherapy.Nature cancer · 2026Review
- The interplay between recovery and immunity in infectious and non-communicable diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in peptide cancer vaccine design: from neoantigen discovery to immunogenicity prediction.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T cells play a dual role in various physiopathological states, capable of eliminating tumors and infected cells, while also playing a pathogenic role when activated by autoantigens, causing self-tissue damage. The regulation of T cell-peptide/major histocompatibility complex (TCR-pMHC) recognition is crucial for maintaining disease balance and treating cancer, infections, and autoimmune diseases. Despite efforts, predictive models of TCR-pMHC specificity are still in the early stages. Inspired by advances in protein structure prediction via deep neural networks, we evaluated AlphaFold 3 (AF3)-based AI computation as a method to predict TCR epitope specificity. We demonstrate that AlphaFold can model TCR-pMHC interactions, distinguishing valid epitopes from invalid ones with increasing accuracy. Immunogenic epitopes can be identified for vaccine development through in silico high-throughput processes. Additionally, higher-affinity and specific T cells can be designed to enhance therapy efficacy and safety. An accurate TCR-pMHC prediction model is expected to greatly benefit T-cell-mediated immunotherapy and aid drug design. Overall, precise prediction of T-cell immunogenicity holds significant therapeutic potential, allowing the identification of peptide epitopes linked to tumors, infections, and autoimmune diseases. Although there is much work to be done before these predictions achieve widespread practical use, we are optimistic that deep learning-based structural modeling is a promising pathway for the generalizable prediction of TCR-pMHC interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.