ArticleWater resources research2025
Deep Learning Prediction and Interpretation of Riverine Nitrate Export Across the Mississippi River Basin.
Article in Water resources research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning Prediction and Interpretation of Riverine Nitrate Export Across the Mississippi River Basin.Water resources research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Excess riverine nitrate causes downstream eutrophication, notably in the Gulf of Mexico where hypoxia is linked to nutrient-rich discharge from the Mississippi River Basin (MRB). We developed a long short-term memory (LSTM) model using high-frequency sensor data from across the conterminous US to predict daily nitrate concentrations, achieving strong temporal validation performance (median KGE = 0.60). Spatial validation-or prediction in unmonitored basins-yielded lower performance for nitrate concentration (median KGE = 0.18). Nonetheless, spatial validation was crucial in quantifying the impact of current data gaps and guiding the model's targeted application to the MRB where spatial validation performance was stronger (median KGE = 0.34). Modeling results for the MRB from 1980 to 2022 showed relatively low riverine nitrate export (19 ± 4% of surplus), indicating large-scale retention of surplus nitrate within the MRB. Interannual nitrate yields varied significantly, especially in Midwestern states like Iowa, where wet-year export fractions (42 ± 24%) far exceeded dry year export (6 ± 6%), suggesting increased hydrologic connectivity and remobilization of legacy nitrogen. Further evidence of legacy nitrate remobilization was noted in a subset of Midwestern basins where, on occasion, annual surplus export fractions exceeded 100%. Interpretable Shapley values identified key spatial drivers influencing mean nitrate concentrations-tile drainage, roadway density, wetland cover-and quantitative, non-linear thresholds in their influence, offering management targets. This study leverages machine learning and aquatic sensing to provide improved spatiotemporal predictions and insights into nitrate drivers, thresholds, and legacy impacts, offering valuable information for targeted nutrient management strategies in the MRB.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.