ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
A dataset for detecting walking, grazing, and resting behaviors in free-grazing cattle using IoT collar IMU signals.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design Considerations, Field Validation and Perspectives of a Low-Power Wearable Sensor Collar for Continuous Monitoring of Ruminants.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GADF-enhanced global-local feature network for wearable sensor-based cow behavior recognition.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we developed a dataset of behaviors associated with lameness in dairy cows. The data collection utilized IoT collars that were placed around the necks of 10 dairy cows. This publicly available dataset contains 441 labeled behaviors, amounting to over 7 h of recording time. It includes acceleration data referenced in both body and world frames, as well as gyroscope signals, which facilitated the extraction of 112 relevant features for classifying key behaviors such as walking, grazing, and resting through machine learning algorithms. To enhance model performance and reduce feature dimensionality, automatic feature selection techniques were applied before classification. The dataset's effectiveness was assessed using various classification models, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, and Random Forests. Results indicated that signals referenced to the body frame yielded better behavior discrimination, achieving a maximum macro F1-score of 0.9625 with the SVM model. This public dataset can facilitate early lameness detection by enabling accurate classification of behavior patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.