Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40948570›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

The Prospective Randomized EValuation of Emerging Novel Treatments for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Replacement (PREVENT-iT): Feasibility and Safety Study.

Thomas J Wood, Sameer Parpia, Isabelle Tate, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud, Michael Tanzer, Adam Hart, Anthony Albers, Qirui Hou, Mohit Bhandari and 1 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06126614 (Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Emerging Novel Treatments for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Replacement), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06126614 phase3recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Emerging Novel Treatments for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Replacement (PREVENT-iT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamilton Health Sciences CorporationRan2024 to 2028Enrolled21,006ConditionsPeriprosthetic Joint InfectionArmsChlorhexidine Gluconate, Vancomycin Hydrochloride, Povidone-Iodine, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas J WoodDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-444X
Sameer ParpiaMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-5622
Isabelle TateHamilton Arthroplasty Group, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6055-132X
Hassaan Abdel KhalikDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1711-515X
Ernesto Muñoz-MahamudHospital Clínico de Barcelona, Carrer de Vallarroel, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2260-1117
Michael TanzerMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8986-6326
Adam HartMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal Quebec, Canada.
Anthony AlbersMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8456-6209
Qirui HouMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1304-0231
Mohit BhandariMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
PREVENT-IT Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the success of total joint arthroplasty for end-stage hip and knee osteoarthritis, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a devastating complication and leading cause of revision surgery. Antiseptic irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics are promising and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of PJIs, though high-quality evidence assessing their efficacy is lacking. Therefore, this study investigates the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to determine the optimal prophylactic treatment of PJIs using various irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics. Methods: Using a simple randomized 3 × 2 factorial trial, patients were randomized across 5 centers to 1 of 6 possible treatments (povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine-gluconate, or saline, with or without vancomycin). Nine criteria were assessed to evaluate feasibility including participant enrollment, administration of treatments, data collection methods, and protocol compliance. Adverse event rates were used to assess trial safety. Secondary outcomes included rates of PJI requiring reoperation and persistent wound drainage (PWD). Results: Four hundred and ninety-five participants were included in the pilot trial. Study participants were 56% female with a mean age of 67 years. Seven of the 9 criteria assessing feasibility indicated the trial was successful and no modifications needed. Two criteria, treatment contamination (8.5%) and completeness of patient follow-up (93.8%), were graded as requiring minor adjustment before conducting the definitive trial. There were 114 serious adverse events; none of which were deemed associated with the treatments. Overall, 9 (1.84%) presented with PJIs requiring reoperation, and 6 patients (1.12%) presented with PWD. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of prophylactic irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics. PREVENT-IT has received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research toward the definitive, large, multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT06126614).Ultimately, findings will directly affect clinical practice with the potential to positively influence global rates of PJI. Level of Evidence: NA.

Identifiers

PMID40948570
PMCPMC12431753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.