Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40948566›Full record

ArticleACM CHIL 2021 : proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning : April 8-9, 2021, Virtual Event. ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning (2021 : Online)2021

Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations.

Paidamoyo Chapfuwa, Serge Assaad, Shuxi Zeng, Michael J Pencina, Lawrence Carin, Ricardo Henao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM CHIL 2021 : proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning : April 8-9, 2021, Virtual Event. ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning (2021 : Online), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine Learning Methods to Estimate Individualized Treatment Effects for Use in Health Technology Assessment.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paidamoyo ChapfuwaDuke University, USA.
Serge AssaadDuke University, USA.
Shuxi ZengDuke University, USA.
Michael J PencinaDuke University, USA.
Lawrence CarinDuke University, USA.
Ricardo HenaoDuke University, USA.

Funding

Data HarmonizationR61NS120246 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PENCINA, MICHAEL J · 2020 to 2022
$2.0M
QuBBD: Deep Poisson Methods for Biomedical Time-to-Event and Longitude Data R01EB025020 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CARIN, LAWRENCE, HENAO GIRALDO, RICARDO · 2017 to 2019
$773k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025020NINDS NIH HHS R61 NS120246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balanced representation learning methods have been applied successfully to counterfactual inference from observational data. However, approaches that account for survival outcomes are relatively limited. Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications,

Indexed as

causal survival analysiscounterfactual inferencehazard ratiorepresentation learningsurvival analysistime-to-event

Identifiers

PMID40948566
PMCPMC12423760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.