Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40948562›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Physiological correlates of a simple saccadic-decision task to extended objects in superior colliculus.

Baptiste Caziot, Bonnie Cooper, Mark R Harwood, Robert M McPeek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Baptiste CaziotGraduate Center for Vision Research, Department of Biological and Vision Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, 33 West 42 Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Bonnie CooperGraduate Center for Vision Research, Department of Biological and Vision Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, 33 West 42 Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Mark R HarwoodDepartment of Biology, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, USA.
Robert M McPeekGraduate Center for Vision Research, Department of Biological and Vision Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, 33 West 42 Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.

Funding

Saccade Target Selection in Naturalistic Visual SearchR01EY030669 · NEI · STATE COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI ROBERT M MCPEEK, GREGORY J ZELINSKY · 2019 to 2026
$4.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements direct gaze to objects of interest. Human studies show that saccade initiation latency depends on the size of the saccade target (the "size-latency effect"), perhaps reflecting a tradeoff between the cost of making a saccade and the expected information gain. Here, we investigated the neuronal correlates of the size-latency effect in macaque superior colliculus (SC). Analysis of saccade latencies within a stochastic accumulator framework predicted a steeper increase in activity for smaller targets compared to larger ones, and, surprisingly, an increase in saccade initiation threshold for smaller targets. We found that SC activity is in close agreement with these predictions. We also found evidence that these effects may be a consequence of the visual responses of SC neurons to targets of different sizes. The results shed new light on the sources of delay within the saccadic system, a system that we heavily depend upon for visuo-motor tasks.

Indexed as

Biological sciencesNatural sciencesNeuroscienceSensory neuroscienceSystems neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID40948562
PMCPMC12432453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.