Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40948551›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Individual differences in experiential diversity shape event segmentation granularity.

Carl J Hodgetts, Samuel C Berry, Mark Postans, Angharad N Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carl J HodgettsDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
Samuel C BerryDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
Mark PostansCommunicable Disease Surveillance Centre, Public Health Wales, Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK.
Angharad N WilliamsDepartment of Psychology, Chaucer, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parsing experience into meaningful events or units, known as event segmentation, may be critical for structuring episodic memory, planning, and navigating spatial and social environments. However, little is known about what factors shape inter-individual differences in event segmentation. Here, we show that individuals with greater variation in their daily social and spatial lives (experiential diversity) displayed more fine-grained event segmentation during a movie-viewing task. This relationship held after considering potential confounds, such as anxiety, loneliness, and socioeconomic factors, and was primarily driven by variation in social experiential diversity. Exploratory analyses revealed that the relationship between social experiential diversity and segmentation granularity was stronger in high-anxiety participants, suggesting heightened vigilance to fine-grained social-emotional cues during movie-viewing. These results support the view that event segmentation can occur proactively based on social and spatial environmental dynamics learned "in the wild" and provide a potential cognitive pathway through which isolation impacts cognitive health.

Indexed as

NeuroscienceSocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID40948551
PMCPMC12432452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.