ArticleiScience2025
Individual differences in experiential diversity shape event segmentation granularity.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parsing experience into meaningful events or units, known as event segmentation, may be critical for structuring episodic memory, planning, and navigating spatial and social environments. However, little is known about what factors shape inter-individual differences in event segmentation. Here, we show that individuals with greater variation in their daily social and spatial lives (experiential diversity) displayed more fine-grained event segmentation during a movie-viewing task. This relationship held after considering potential confounds, such as anxiety, loneliness, and socioeconomic factors, and was primarily driven by variation in social experiential diversity. Exploratory analyses revealed that the relationship between social experiential diversity and segmentation granularity was stronger in high-anxiety participants, suggesting heightened vigilance to fine-grained social-emotional cues during movie-viewing. These results support the view that event segmentation can occur proactively based on social and spatial environmental dynamics learned "in the wild" and provide a potential cognitive pathway through which isolation impacts cognitive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.