ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
Few-shot segmentation and fiber tractography of human vagus nerve using 3D-MUSE imaging.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accelerating the development of bioelectronic medicine: outcomes and innovations from the NIH SPARC initiative.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We are dissecting and imaging 100 human cadaver nerves with unprecedented range of anatomical coverage (from brainstem to abdomen) and imaging modalities. Our teams used 3D serial block-face Microscopy with Ultraviolet Surface Excitation (3D-MUSE) to image, visualize, and quantify the morphology and microanatomy of the human vagus nerve, providing three-dimensional insights into its structure and functional organization. We prepared 3-mm and 5-mm-long samples of human cervical vagus and median nerve using various staining and embedding techniques before imaging with 0.9-μm in-plane resolution and between 3-μm and 12-μm slice thickness. Staining quality varied across samples thus requiring training of a sample-based neural network rather than using a generalized analysis algorithm. We used few-shot learning to segment the fascicles, perineurium, and epineurium regions. We trained a 2D U-Net architecture with 4-8% of each sample's images before applying to a held-out test set. Performance achieved a mean Dice score range of 0.85±0.10 and 0.93±0.05 across various 3D-MUSE samples. We also investigated an initial pre-training step of the U-Net model to improve segmentation performance. Pre-training enabled the segmentation model to have better awareness of splitting fascicles in the held-out test set. From sample segmentation predictions, morphologic metrics such as nerve diameter, fascicle count, fascicle area, fascicle diameter, and perineurium thickness are calculated. Nerve fiber tractography from sample images highlight dynamic fascicle organization throughout 3-mm nerve samples These results demonstrate the importance and success of sample-based training for segmentation and nerve fiber tractography, with further training anticipated to yield even better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.