Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947989›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2025

A Novel Method for Detecting Intersectional DIF: Multilevel Random Item Effects Model with Regularized Gaussian Variational Estimation.

He Ren, Weicong Lyu, Chun Wang, Gongjun Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

He RenCollege of Education, https://ror.org/00cvxb145University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1208-7089
Weicong LyuFaculty of Education, https://ror.org/04gpd4q15University of Macau, Macau, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8159-2161
Chun WangCollege of Education, https://ror.org/00cvxb145University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2695-9781
Gongjun XuDepartment of Statistics, https://ror.org/00jmfr291University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Institute of Education Sciences R305D240021National Science Foundation 2300382, 1846747, 2150601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF) screening has long been suggested to ensure assessment fairness. Traditional DIF methods typically focus on the main effects of demographic variables on item parameters, overlooking the interactions among multiple identities. Drawing on the intersectionality framework, we define intersectional DIF as deviations in item parameters that arise from the interactions among demographic variables beyond their main effects and propose a novel item response theory (IRT) approach for detecting intersectional DIF. Under our framework, fixed effects are used to account for traditional DIF, while random item effects are introduced to capture intersectional DIF. We further introduce the concept of intersectional impact, which refers to interaction effects on group-level mean ability. Depending on which item parameters are affected and whether intersectional impact is considered, we propose four models, which aim to detect intersectional uniform DIF (UDIF), intersectional UDIF with intersectional impact, intersectional non-uniform DIF (NUDIF), and intersectional NUDIF with intersectional impact, respectively. For efficient model estimation, a regularized Gaussian variational expectation-maximization algorithm is developed. Simulation studies demonstrate that our methods can effectively detect intersectional UDIF, although their detection of intersectional NUDIF is more limited.

Indexed as

differential item functioningintersectional DIFregularizationvariational estimation

Identifiers

PMID40947989
PMCPMC13121815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.