Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947958›Full record

SynthesisJDR clinical and translational research2026

Perioperative Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Recovery after Periodontal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

M Abusamak, A Elananza, I Alshdaifat, F S Al-Hamed, H Al-Waeli

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JDR clinical and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M AbusamakFaculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-0055
A ElananzaDentistry Department, Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
I AlshdaifatDentistry Department, Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
F S Al-HamedCollege of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
H Al-WaeliFaculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeriodontal disease is a multifactorial chronic inflammatory condition that progressively destroys the periodontal supportive tissues. While periodontal surgical therapy is a successful treatment for periodontal disease, patients often experience postoperative complications such as pain, swelling, and discomfort, which affect their quality of life. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative steroidal and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (SAIDs and NSAIDs) on postoperative pain and swelling and rescue medication consumption in adults undergoing periodontal surgeries.

methodsA protocol guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was followed. Multiple online databases were searched up to April 2025 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing perioperative SAIDs and NSAIDs after periodontal surgery. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain, while the secondary outcome measures were swelling and rescue medication consumption using a random-effects model. The GRADE system assessed the quality of the evidence for each included study.

resultsOf 2,354 articles screened, 6 RCTs with 262 participants were included. Perioperative NSAIDs showed a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain for the first 6 h postoperatively compared with perioperative SAIDs (mean difference [MD]: 1.00 to 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21, 3.77). Perioperative SAIDs yielded a statistically significantly greater reduction in postoperative pain 48 h postoperatively than perioperative NSAIDs did (MD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.31, -0.14). Perioperative SAIDs and NSAIDs had comparable outcomes in terms of postoperative swelling and rescue medication consumption. DISCUSSION: Perioperative NSAIDs may be more effective in reducing early postoperative pain while SAIDs might offer better longer-term pain management postoperatively after periodontal surgery. However, these findings should be viewed with caution because of the clinically insignificant differences and the evidence based on few studies, with moderate-to-low certainty of evidence, due to methodological biases and discrepancies in drugs used and regimens. Therefore, further optimized RCTs confirming the efficacy and safety of perioperative SAIDs and NSAIDs in periodontal surgical procedures are still needed.Knowledge Transfer Statement:This systematic review and analysis found moderate-to-low-certainty evidence and limitations in the studies assessing the effectiveness of perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs to improve postoperative recovery after periodontal surgical therapies. This emphasizes the need for individualized perioperative therapeutic protocols based on surgical complexity and the need for tension-free wound healing pending further high-quality trials.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalPeriodontal DiseasesPerioperative CarePostoperative PainEdemaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidalanti-inflammatory agentsnonsteroidaloralpainpain managementperiodonticspostoperativesteroidssurgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID40947958
PMCPMC13232574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.