ArticleJournal of minimally invasive surgery2025
Inguinal hernia repair under crisis: a retrospective cohort study of surgical outcomes across the COVID-19 era in China.
Article in Journal of minimally invasive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected healthcare systems worldwide, altering clinical practices and surgical outcomes. However, its specific impact on inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has not been extensively studied. This research investigates the effects of the pandemic on surgical outcomes and the evolution of surgical techniques during the COVID-19 era. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical site infections (SSIs), secondary infections, postsurgical pain, edema, and the shift in surgical techniques in IHR patients. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study involving 1,067 patients who underwent elective unilateral IHR from 2018 to 2024 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, who were categorized into three groups based on the time of surgery: pre=pandemic (n = 239), pandemic (n = 592), and post-pandemic (n = 236).Clinical variables included surgical techniques, SSI classification, postsurgical pain, edema, hospitalization duration, and comorbid conditions. Results: Significant decrease in superficial and organ/space SSIs during the pandemic, particularly with laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.13; Conclusion: The post-pandemic group was associated with improved surgical outcomes, including reduced SSI rates, postsurgical pain, and shorter hospital stays, likely due to the increased use of laparoscopic surgery. These findings underscore the importance of adapting surgical approaches in response to crisis-driven changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.