ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: The FOREST protocol, a patient-centered approach that clusters two cohorts with different outcomes.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- De-escalated total neoadjuvant therapy for the non-operative management of rectal cancer: Results of the NOM-3/TNT prospective cohort study.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: The FOREST protocol, a patient-centered approach that clusters two cohorts with different outcomes.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Impact on Clinical- and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures of an Organ Preservation-Based Therapeutic Strategy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: The FOREST Project.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal cancer treatment has evolved toward individualized strategies that emphasize organ preservation and tailored therapeutic approaches. The FOREST protocol combines total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), early response evaluation, and prehabilitation within a comprehensive framework designed to optimize outcomes while minimizing overtreatment. In this single-center prospective study, 67 patients with rectal cancer (T1-T4, any N) were enrolled between April 2020 and December 2022. Treatment decisions-radical surgery (RS), watch and wait (WW), or local surgery (LS)-were guided by early and final response assessments. Outcomes were analyzed under an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with a median follow-up of 968 days (range: 440-2015). Final treatments included RS in 47.8% (n = 32), WW in 50.7% (n = 34), and LS in 1.5% (n = 1). Completion of TNT was achieved in 79.1% of patients. Organ preservation was accomplished in 44.8% (30/67 = 44.8%, with 34 WW and 1 LS). Systemic recurrence occurred in 22.4% of patients, surpassing the rate of local regrowth or persistence (17.9%). DFS in the WW group (65.7%) was comparable to that of the RS group (71.4%), while OS significantly favored WW (100% vs. 80.7%, p = .014). The FOREST protocol demonstrates that integrating TNT with response-guided strategies is feasible and can lead to high organ preservation rates and favorable oncologic outcomes. A key strength of the protocol is its ability to identify two distinct patient cohorts based on response evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.