Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947902›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: The FOREST protocol, a patient-centered approach that clusters two cohorts with different outcomes.

Hector Guadalajara, Jose Luis Domínguez-Tristancho, Raquel Fuentes Mateo, Miguel Leon-Arellano, Raquel Sanz-Baro, Eleonora Geraldi, Ana Isabel Hormigo-Sanchez, Víctor Manuel Castellano Megías, Marta Pérez Cobos, Patricia Mellado Miras and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hector GuadalajaraHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6297-9347
Jose Luis Domínguez-TristanchoHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Raquel Fuentes MateoHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Leon-ArellanoHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Raquel Sanz-BaroHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Eleonora GeraldiHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Isabel Hormigo-SanchezHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Víctor Manuel Castellano MegíasHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Pérez CobosHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Patricia Mellado MirasHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Begoña Lopez-Botet ZuluetaHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Mariano Garcia-ArranzHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Jesus García FoncillasHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina CaramésHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Damián García-OlmoHospital Universitario Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9369-2338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal cancer treatment has evolved toward individualized strategies that emphasize organ preservation and tailored therapeutic approaches. The FOREST protocol combines total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), early response evaluation, and prehabilitation within a comprehensive framework designed to optimize outcomes while minimizing overtreatment. In this single-center prospective study, 67 patients with rectal cancer (T1-T4, any N) were enrolled between April 2020 and December 2022. Treatment decisions-radical surgery (RS), watch and wait (WW), or local surgery (LS)-were guided by early and final response assessments. Outcomes were analyzed under an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with a median follow-up of 968 days (range: 440-2015). Final treatments included RS in 47.8% (n = 32), WW in 50.7% (n = 34), and LS in 1.5% (n = 1). Completion of TNT was achieved in 79.1% of patients. Organ preservation was accomplished in 44.8% (30/67 = 44.8%, with 34 WW and 1 LS). Systemic recurrence occurred in 22.4% of patients, surpassing the rate of local regrowth or persistence (17.9%). DFS in the WW group (65.7%) was comparable to that of the RS group (71.4%), while OS significantly favored WW (100% vs. 80.7%, p = .014). The FOREST protocol demonstrates that integrating TNT with response-guided strategies is feasible and can lead to high organ preservation rates and favorable oncologic outcomes. A key strength of the protocol is its ability to identify two distinct patient cohorts based on response evaluation.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient-Centered CareProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWatchful Waitinglocal surgeryorgan preservationrectal cancertotal neoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID40947902
PMCPMC12670339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.