Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
The Effect of Butyrylated Starch on Bowel Polyps in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Results of a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial.
Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in chemoprevention of familial adenomatous polyposis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Advances in research on congenital and hereditary intestinal diseases: From molecular mechanisms to precision medicine.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Butyrate may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and can be delivered to the colon using butyrylated high-amylose maize starch (HAMSB). This trial evaluated the effects of HAMSB on polyp burden in participants with familial adenomatous polyposis. This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. In three 6-month periods, participants ingested 40 g/day of HAMSB or low-amylose starch, followed by the alternative, and then a washout. Participants underwent four video-recorded colonoscopies to assess polyp burden as the primary endpoint. At baseline, two distal bowel tattoos were placed: tattoo one where polyps were cleared at each scope and tattoo two where polyps were left in situ. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate the ratio of mean polyp counts in intervention compared with placebo periods. Seventy-two participants were randomized (33 female), with 49 completing the study. In the intention-to-treat analysis, HAMSB did not reduce mean global [0.9 fold change (FC); 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77-1.06; P = 0.218] or small (<2.4 mm) polyp numbers (0.88 FC; 95% CI, 0.71-1.1; P = 0.267). There was a trend for the reduction of small polyps in tattoo one (0.72 FC; 95% CI, 0.5-1.03; P = 0.074). In the per-protocol analysis, there was a strong trend for HAMSB to reduce mean global small polyp numbers (0.79 FC; 95% CI, 0.62-1; P = 0.051). HAMSB may reduce polyp initiation in the distal bowel without causing regression or growth of existing polyps. However, 95% CIs indicate large uncertainty to the true direction of the treatment effect, and the P values provide only weak evidence against the null hypothesis of no treatment effect. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: There is convincing evidence that dietary fiber reduces the risk of colorectal cancer possibly by production of butyrate during microbial fermentation of indigestible fiber. This study was designed to determine if a dietary supplement that delivers butyrate to the colon reduces polyp burden in participants with familial adenomatous polyposis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.