Observational studyEpilepsia open2025
MonoPER study: Effectiveness and tolerability of PERampanel in monotherapy in real-world after 12 months of treatment.
Observational study in Epilepsia open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MonoPER study: Effectiveness and tolerability of PERampanel in monotherapy in real-world after 12 months of treatment.Epilepsia open · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and retention of PER as monotherapy in adults with focal or idiopathic generalized epilepsy over a 12-month period in routine clinical practice.
methodsIn this single-center, ambispective, noninterventional observational study, 74 patients (age 18-90 years) initiated PER monotherapy-either as first-line treatment (n = 21) or conversion from another antiseizure medication (n = 53)-and were followed for 12 months. Demographic and clinical variables, prior antiseizure regimens, indication for PER initiation (suboptimal seizure control, adverse effects, or sleep improvement), PER dosage, seizure outcomes (seizure freedom and ≥ 50% reduction), and adverse events (AEs) were recorded at 6- and 12-month visits. Retention rates were calculated, and safety was assessed by AE reports and discontinuations.
resultsThe mean PER dose was 7.22 ± 1.71 mg/day, with 85.1% of patients remaining on monotherapy at 12 months (first-line: 90.5%; conversion: 83.0%). Overall, 70.3% of patients achieved seizure freedom at 12 months (first-line: 81.0%; conversion: 66.0%), and 79.7% were ≥ 50% responders (first-line: 85.7%; conversion: 75.5%). In patients initiated for sleep improvement (n = 24), hypnotic medications were withdrawn in 87.5%, and 79% reported better sleep. AEs were reported in 46.2% of patients at 12 months, most commonly somnolence (28.4%), dizziness (18.9%), and irritability (10.8%). Severe AEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 6.7% of cases. SIGNIFICANCE: In a real-world cohort, PER monotherapy demonstrated high rates of seizure freedom and retention, with a manageable safety profile. These findings support PER as an effective and tolerable monotherapy option for adult patients with focal or idiopathic generalized epilepsy, corroborating similar observations in recent Epilepsia Open studies of antiseizure monotherapy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Perampanel (PER) is approved as an add-on treatment for seizures, but information on its use alone (monotherapy) is scarce. We studied 74 adults who started PER by itself-either as their first treatment or after stopping another medication-over 1 year. Eighty-five percent stayed on PER for the full year. Seventy percent became seizure-free, and nearly 80% had their seizures cut by at least half. In those taking PER to improve sleep, most could stop sleep-aid drugs and reported better rest. Side effects (mostly mild sleepiness, dizziness, or irritability) occurred in about half of patients, but only 7% stopped PER because of them. Our results suggest that PER alone works well and is generally well tolerated in everyday clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.