Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947825›Full record

ArticleAnimal models and experimental medicine2026

Definition of critical skin defect and concepts of structural and functional repairs: Proposal and verification in a rat model.

Cong Sun, Weihong Guo, Fang Liang, Rabia Javed, Weijian Hou, Xingdong Zhang, Qiang Ao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cong SunDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Weihong GuoXuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fang LiangDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Rabia JavedDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Weijian HouDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xingdong ZhangNMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Research and Control of Tissue Regenerative Biomaterial, Institute of Regulatory Science for Medical Device, National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qiang AoDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1309-1971

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2410403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRats are often used to prepare skin defect models. However, the skin defect sizes of the models prepared by researchers are different, and the lack of consensus on the critical-size defect makes it difficult to compare their research results.

methodsThe time for wound closure was evaluated and recorded through gross observation. The regression equation between the healing time and the diameter of skin defect was established, which can be used to predict the healing time for a certain skin defect size in rats. Histochemical and immunohistochemical staining was used to observe the regeneration and reconstruction of skin appendages, and the functional skin repair was quantitatively scored.

resultsThe critical-size defect of rats was determined based on the maximum capacity of structural skin repair, and the functional skin repair was quantitatively scored based on the regeneration and reconstruction of skin appendages. The allowable range of critical-size skin defect of SD rats lies between 45 and 50 mm in diameter. The concept of structural repair and the category of functional repair of injured skin are put forward. The regression equation between the structural skin healing time and defect diameters is established.

conclusionThe allowable range of skin critical-size defect of SD rats lies between 45 and 50 mm in diameter. The regression equation between the structural skin healing time and defect diameters can be used to predict the healing time for a certain skin defect size in rats.

Indexed as

SkinWound HealingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRegenerationcritical defectfunctional repairquantitative evaluationskin defectstructural repair

Identifiers

PMID40947825
PMCPMC12907982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.