Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947775›Full record

ArticleStudies in family planning2025

How Do We Measure Contraceptive Method Preferences? Evidence From a Scoping Review.

Carolina Cardona, Jamila Asker, Emily Sanchez, Philip Anglewicz

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in family planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jamila Asker
Emily Sanchez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in person-centered measures for family planning and the importance of reproductive preferences, little is known about the measurement of contraceptive preferences. Population surveys have implicitly assumed that contracepting people have achieved their method of choice. In this scoping review, we explored how contraceptive method preferences have been defined and measured in different settings. We included 55 articles focused on measuring people's preferred method of contraception or preferred attributes of contraception. Thirty-seven articles were conducted in high-income countries (HIC), five in upper-middle-income countries (UMIC), and thirteen in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Sixteen articles measured preferences for specific methods of contraception, 36 measured the preferred attributes of contraceptive methods, and three implemented both approaches. Four articles used consistent language to measure the preferred method of contraception, although many used synonyms of "preferences," and some constrained their questions to method availability or cost. The measurement of preferred attributes of contraception varied across articles, even within similar contexts and populations. Key attributes included side effects, effectiveness, and cost. Our results highlight the increasing interest in understanding contraceptive preferences, but gaps remain in developing best practices. This is critical as the family planning field moves toward person-centered metrics that emphasize individual choice.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorPatient PreferenceChoice BehaviorDeveloping CountriesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID40947775
PMCPMC12501706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.