ArticleJournal of traumatic stress2026
Treatment outcomes for military-affiliated clients with posttraumatic stress disorder in a community mental health network.
Article in Journal of traumatic stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and moderators of PE and CPT in adult PTSD treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Pooled it
- Treatment outcomes for military-affiliated clients with posttraumatic stress disorder in a community mental health network.Journal of traumatic stress · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in military-affiliated populations, including veterans, active duty service members, and their families, remains a significant challenge in the mental health field. Most research on PTSD treatment outcomes has been conducted in controlled trials or within VA and military settings, limiting its generalizability to other clinical environments. This study examined treatment outcomes for 2,717 military-affiliated clients receiving treatment for PTSD within a community mental health network. Treatments included cognitive processing therapy (CPT), eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), or prolonged exposure (PE), with outcomes measured using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) throughout treatment. Clients who attended at least four sessions showed substantial symptom reductions for CPT (ΔM = 19.3), d = 0.98; EMDR (ΔM = 16.6), d = 0.86; and PE (ΔM = 17.4), d = 0.87, all of which exceeded improvements seen with other treatments (ΔM = 12.6), d = 0.71. Analyses of clinically meaningful change thresholds showed similar results across treatments, with 51.9% of CPT, 47.8% of EMDR, and 53.1% of PE clients experiencing a PCL-5 score reduction of at least 18 points after four or more sessions. Dropout prior to four sessions was notable, with 27.5%-40.1% of clients across treatment groups discontinuing treatment before reaching this threshold. Overall, the findings provide real-world evidence supporting the effectiveness of CPT, EMDR, and PE in military-affiliated populations and validate their continued use in community mental health settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.